Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSunde, Geir Arneen_US
dc.contributor.authorHeltne, Jon-Kennethen_US
dc.contributor.authorLockey, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorBurns, Brianen_US
dc.contributor.authorSandberg, Mårtenen_US
dc.contributor.authorFredriksen, Knuten_US
dc.contributor.authorHufthammer, Karl Oveen_US
dc.contributor.authorSoti, Akosen_US
dc.contributor.authorLyon, Richarden_US
dc.contributor.authorJäntti, Helenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKämäräinen, Anttien_US
dc.contributor.authorReid, Bjørn Oleen_US
dc.contributor.authorSilfvast, Tomen_US
dc.contributor.authorHarm, Falkoen_US
dc.contributor.authorSollid, Stephen J. M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-21T12:46:19Z
dc.date.available2016-03-21T12:46:19Z
dc.date.issued2015-08-07
dc.PublishedScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 2015, 23eng
dc.identifier.issn1757-7241
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/11719
dc.description.abstractBackground. Despite numerous studies on prehospital airway management, results are difficult to compare due to inconsistent or heterogeneous data. The objective of this study was to assess advanced airway management from international physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical services. Methods. We collected airway data from 21 helicopter emergency medical services in Australia, England, Finland, Hungary, Norway and Switzerland over a 12-month period. A uniform Utstein-style airway template was used for collecting data. Results. The participating services attended 14,703 patients on primary missions during the study period, and 2,327 (16 %) required advanced prehospital airway interventions. Of these, tracheal intubation was attempted in 92 % of the cases. The rest were managed with supraglottic airway devices (5 %), bag-valve-mask ventilation (2 %) or continuous positive airway pressure (0.2 %). Intubation failure rates were 14.5 % (first-attempt) and 1.2 % (overall). Cardiac arrest patients showed significantly higher first-attempt intubation failure rates (odds ratio: 2.0; 95 % CI: 1.5-2.6; p < 0.001) compared to non-cardiac arrest patients. Complications were recorded in 13 %, with recognised oesophageal intubation being the most frequent (25 % of all patients with complications). For non-cardiac arrest patients, important risk predictors for first-attempt failure were patient age (a non-linear association) and administration of sedatives (reduced failure risk). The patient’s sex, provider’s intubation experience, trauma type (patient category), indication for airway intervention and use of neuromuscular blocking agents were not risk factors for first-attempt intubation failure. Conclusions. Advanced airway management in physician-staffed prehospital services was performed frequently, with high intubation success rates and low complication rates overall. However, cardiac arrest patients showed significantly higher first-attempt failure rates compared to non-cardiac arrest patients. All failed intubations were handled successfully with a rescue device or surgical airway.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BY 4.0eng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0eng
dc.subjectAdvanced trauma life supporteng
dc.subjectAirway managementeng
dc.subjectEmergency medical serviceseng
dc.subjectIntubationeng
dc.subjectOut-of-hospital cardiac arresteng
dc.titleAirway management by physician-staffed Helicopter Emergency Medical Services – a prospective, multicentre, observational study of 2,327 patientsen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2015-11-10T09:58:52Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright Sunde et al. 2015
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0136-9
dc.identifier.cristin1265051
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY 4.0
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY 4.0