Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMyklebost, Svenn-Arve
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-05T08:33:34Z
dc.date.available2016-07-05T08:33:34Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.PublishedEarly Modern Culture Online 2010, 1(1):12-20eng
dc.identifier.issn1892-0888
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/12257
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores the significance of naming and the role of editing practices of Shakespeare's plays: Is it Imogen or Innogen, Falstaff or Oldcastle? By looking into how editors of Shakespeare have approached these and other naming problems we will investigate what has influenced their approaches and choices, what the implications of their choices might be and what we may learn from their ways of thinking about textual editing, be it defective or successful. This paper therefore deals with editing practices in general and, more specifically, with the actual significance of naming: is Henry IV featuring Sir John Oldcastle a wholly different play from Henry IV featuring Sir John Falstaff?en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherEMRGeng
dc.relation.urihttp://emco.project.uia.no/index.php/EMCO/article/view/4/6
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/eng
dc.titleBy whatever nameeng
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2016-04-11T05:59:23Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2010 The Authorseng
dc.identifier.cristin525495
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Humaniora: 000::Litteraturvitenskapelige fag: 040::Engelsk litteratur: 043
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Humanities: 000::Literature: 040::English literature: 043


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY