Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReime, Monika Alvestad
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-20T09:56:31Z
dc.date.available2018-08-20T09:56:31Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1893-1049
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/18155
dc.description.abstractThis article explores professional discourses in the Norwegian residential child care system. It discusses how the discourses serve as constraints on and possibilities for evidence-based practice when different definitions of evidence-based practice are considered. Among the Nordic countries, Norway has been a forerunner in the implementation of evidence-based practice in child welfare. However, I argue that tensions exist, both within professional practice and between professional understandings and policy aims. I use discourse theory to analyze interviews with 19 professionals working in coercive residential child care. The results reveal two competing professional discourses: the discourse of technoscience and the discourse of indeterminacy. Possibilities of evidence-based practice in residential child care are found within both discourses if a wide and inclusive definition of evidence-based practice is applied. This study emphasizes the importance of engaging in constant reflection when discussing possibilities for evidence-based practice within residential child care.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherNordic network of researchers in the study of professions (NORDPRO)eng
dc.relation.ispartof<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/1956/18156" target="_blank">Barn på tvang. Nyere styringstrender og konkurrerende diskurser i institusjonsbarnevernet</a>
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0eng
dc.subjectprofessional discourseseng
dc.subjectresidential child careeng
dc.subjectevidence-based practiceeng
dc.subjectscientific knowledgeeng
dc.subjectprofessional judgmenteng
dc.subjectindeterminacyeng
dc.subjectdiscretioneng
dc.titleDiscourses in Residential Child Care and Possibilities for Evidence-Based Practiceeng
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2016 The Author(s)en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7577/pp.1434
dc.source.journalProfessions and Professionalism
dc.source.406
dc.source.141
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240::Offentlig og privat administrasjon: 242


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY