• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Social Sciences
  • Department of Geography
  • Department of Geography
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Social Sciences
  • Department of Geography
  • Department of Geography
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Inequality dynamics: A study on income and political inequality in the United States (A conceptual virtual lab)

Gaafar, Khaled Mohamed Soliman
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
master thesis (16.42Mb)
model (.rar-file) (64.67Mb)
model (zip) (102.5Mb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1956/20742
Date
2019-08-30
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Department of Geography [443]
Abstract
Post-tax income inequality in the US has been rising since the mid-1970s at a rate higher than most industrial democracies. Government policy has contributed to, and failed to restrict this trend despite popular concern for the issue of increasing inequality, and against public preferences for progressive taxation. Recent empirical findings have detected a wealth-bias in US policy-making as a result of several factors including low voter participation by low-income earners, political party structure and practices, the role of money in elections, and in lobbying. This research aimed to structure the knowledge on how income inequality translates to political inequality, and vice versa, through a closed-boundary, white-box theory using System Dynamics. Its findings provide a theory explaining the success to the successful phenomenon observed in empirical data, using on a free-market approach to political campaigns and lobbying in the US. The heterogeneity of political behaviour across income groups are the main reason for this divergence in political influence, as well as incomes, of different income groups. Attitude changes towards political spending by low income earners in the US have been shown to be insufficient to reduce the trend of rising inequality. Testing two policies of campaign finance reform, the results of this study indicated that campaign finance reform will have unintended consequences shifting the money from campaigns to lobbying, reinforcing the idea that campaign finance and the lobbying industry exist on a continuum on which money is turned to influence.
Publisher
The University of Bergen
Copyright
Copyright the Author. All rights reserved

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit