Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSpitzer, Aaron
dc.PublishedSpitzer A. Constituting settler colonialism: the ‘boundary problem’, liberal equality, and settler state-making in Australia’s Northern Territory. Postcolonial Studies. 2019;22(4):545-564eng
dc.description.abstractBetween Indigenous sovereignty and settler colonisation lie contested frontiers. I suggest Australia’s Northern Territory is one such frontier. This paper explores the 1998 settler campaign for Northern Territory statehood, the key to which was the framing of a constitution designed to eliminate Indigenous autonomy and empower settlers. I make three contributions. First, I showcase how settler colonialism is metapolitical, implicating political theory’s notorious ‘boundary problem’ in an effort to reconstitute Indigenous territories as ‘ours’ and Indigenous demoi as ‘us’. Second, I show that settlers may wage this metapolitical campaign using individual rights, to challenge as illiberal, and thus de-constitute, Indigenous demotic and territorial boundaries. Finally, I show that when Indigenous peoples resist by seeking to constitutionally entrench their own, alternate answers to the ‘boundary question’, there arises a dilemma over whether settler rights or Indigenous boundaries are the rightful ‘subject of justice’.en_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Franciseng
dc.rightsAttribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives CC BY-NC-NDeng
dc.titleConstituting settler colonialism: the ‘boundary problem’, liberal equality, and settler state-making in Australia’s Northern Territoryeng
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 The Authoren_US
dc.source.journalPostcolonial Studies

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives CC BY-NC-ND
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives CC BY-NC-ND