Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGripsrud, Jostein
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-23T11:16:06Z
dc.date.available2020-06-23T11:16:06Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.PublishedGripsrud J. Comparing Public Discourse on Immigration in Scandinavia: Some Background Notes and Preliminary Results. Javnost - The Public. 2019;26(2):121-137eng
dc.identifier.issn1318-3222
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1956/22829
dc.descriptionUnder embargo until: 2020-10-24en_US
dc.description.abstractThis article briefly presents the SCANPUB project, devoted to the comparative study of public discourse on immigration in Scandinavia from 1970 to 2016, from which this issue of Javnost/The Public stems. Its emphasis is on a discussion of the terms “nation” and “nationalism,” particularly the notion of “methodological nationalism” in relation to the project. SCANPUB is not least about how the public sphere in liberal democracies handles large, complex issues over time, and the article thus deals with relatively recent contributions to the theory of the public sphere, concluding with a turn toward deliberative systems theory. Some preliminary empirical results are reported and references are made to the other articles in this issue.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherTaylor & Franciseng
dc.titleComparing Public Discourse on Immigration in Scandinavia: Some Background Notes and Preliminary Resultseng
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.date.updated2020-01-27T14:50:30Z
dc.description.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 EURICOMen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2019.1600834
dc.identifier.cristin1709122
dc.source.journalJavnost - The Public


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record