• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Social Sciences
  • Department of Comparative Politics
  • Department of Comparative Politics
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Faculty of Social Sciences
  • Department of Comparative Politics
  • Department of Comparative Politics
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Decision-Shaping From the Outside: Measuring and explaining the degree of preference attainment in the EEA EFTA Comments

Karlsen, Ole Johan
Master thesis
View/Open
master thesis (1.799Mb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1956/23874
Date
2020-08-21
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Department of Comparative Politics [347]
Abstract
The membership of Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway in the European Economic Area (EEA) has often been suggested to entail a democratic deficit. These three European Free Trade Association (EFTA) members have to implement a significant share of EU legislation without having representation in the EU institutions. Nevertheless, even without formal voting rights, they may be able to influence EU policy-making. In particular, the EEA agreement ensure the EEA EFTA States the right to be consulted on relevant issues. Accordingly, the three states frequently submit joint comments on policy issues, what is known as the EEA EFTA Comments. However, the importance of these comments, and more generally the EEA EFTA States’ influence on EU policy, has been generally overlooked in the literature. To start filling this important gap, this thesis aims to measuring and explaining the level success in the EEA EFTA Comments. Building on third country and interest group influence theory, I suggest an exchange model for the influence of the EEA EFTA States, expecting area-specific resources, issue controversy and the preferences of the decision-makers to determine preference attainment. To answer the research questions, the thesis employs a multi-method approach. I measure the preference attainment for 273 individual positions found in 80 comments submitted between 1995 and 2019 on draft legislative proposals, analyse the factors of preference attainment using logistic regression and complement my quantitative analysis with interviews with officials from the EFTA Secretariat and EEA EFTA States. The results show that the preferences are fully attained in 39.6 percent and partly attained in 18 percent of the positions. The regression analyses provide support for the hypothesised effect of area-specific resources, indicating that attainment is more likely on energy- and maritime-related issues. The thesis helps to understand the previously under-researched joint efforts of EEA EFTA States to influence EU policy-making.
Publisher
The University of Bergen
Copyright
Copyright the Author. All rights reserved

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit