Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThorsen, Kennethen_US
dc.contributor.authorGlomsaker, Tom Birgeren_US
dc.contributor.authorMeer, Andreas vonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSøreide, Kjetilen_US
dc.contributor.authorSøreide, Jon Arneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-28T14:29:22Z
dc.date.available2011-11-28T14:29:22Z
dc.date.issued2011-05-13eng
dc.PublishedJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 15(8): 1329-1335en
dc.identifier.issn1091-255X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/5241
dc.description.abstractIntroduction While the laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) has been shown to be feasible and safe, its implementation into routine clinical practice has been slow. Only a few studies have evaluated its overall utility. The aim of this study was to investigate changes in surgical management of PPU and associated outcomes. Material and Methods The study was a retrospective, single institution, population-based review of all patients undergoing surgery for PPU between 2003 and 2009. Patient demographics, diagnostic evaluation, management, and outcomes were evaluated. Results Included were 114 patients with a median age of 67 years (range, 20–100). Women comprised 59% and were older (p<0.001), had more comorbidities (p=0.002), and had a higher Boey risk score (p=0.036) compared to men. Perforation location was gastric/pyloric in 72% and duodenal in 28% of patients. Pneumoperitoneum was diagnosed by plain abdominal x-ray in 30 of 41 patients (75%) and by abdominal computerized tomography (CT) in 76 of 77 patients (98%; p<0.001). Laparoscopic treatment was initiated in 48 patients (42%) and completed in 36 patients (75% of attempted cases). Laparoscopic treatment rate increased from 7% to 46% during the study period (p=0.02). Median operation time was shorter in patients treated via laparotomy (70 min) compared to laparoscopy (82 min) and those converted from laparoscopy to laparotomy (105 min; p=0.017). Postoperative complications occurred in 56 patients (49%). Overall 30-day postoperative mortality was 16%. No statistically significant differences were found in morbidity and mortality between open versus laparoscopic repair. Conclusion This study demonstrates an increased use of CT as the primary diagnostic tool for PPU and of laparoscopic repair in its surgical treatment. These changes in management are not associated with altered outcomes.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherSpringereng
dc.rights.urihttp://www.springer.com/open+access/open+choice?SGWID=0-40359-0-0-0eng
dc.subjectPeptic ulcereng
dc.subjectLaparoscopyeng
dc.titleTrends in Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Patients with Perforated Peptic Ulceren_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder©The Author(s) 2011
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1482-1
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750::Gastroscopic surgery: 781eng
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750::Gastroenterology: 773eng


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record