Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRingdal, Kjetil Gorsethen_US
dc.contributor.authorLossius, Hans Mortenen_US
dc.contributor.authorJones, Mary J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLauritsen, Jens M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCoats, Timothy J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Cameron S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLefering, Rolfen_US
dc.contributor.authorBartolomeo, Stefano Dien_US
dc.contributor.authorDries, David J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSøreide, Kjetilen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-24T11:31:40Z
dc.date.available2012-01-24T11:31:40Z
dc.date.issued2011-10-12eng
dc.PublishedCritical Care 2011, 15:R237en
dc.identifier.issn1364-8535
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/5521
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: No worldwide, standardised definitions exist for documenting, reporting and comparing data from severely injured trauma patients. This study evaluated the feasibility of collecting the data variables of the international consensus-derived Utstein Trauma Template. Methods: Trauma centres from three different continents were invited to submit Utstein Trauma Template core data during a defined period, for up to 50 consecutive trauma patients. Directly admitted patients with a New Injury Severity Score (NISS) equal to or above 16 were included. Main outcome variables were data completeness, data differences and data collection difficulty. Results: Centres from Europe (n = 20), North America (n = 3) and Australia (n = 1) submitted data on 965 patients, of whom 783 were included. Median age was 41 years (interquartile range (IQR) 24 to 60), and 73.1% were male. Median NISS was 27 (IQR 20 to 38), and blunt trauma predominated (91.1%). Of the 36 Utstein variables, 13 (36%) were collected by all participating centres. Eleven (46%) centres applied definitions of the survival outcome variable that were different from those of the template. Seventeen (71%) centres used the recommended version of the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). Three variables (age, gender and AIS) were documented in all patients. Completeness > 80% was achieved for 28 variables, and 20 variables were > 90% complete. Conclusions: The Utstein Template was feasible across international trauma centres for the majority of its data variables, with the exception of certain physiological and time variables. Major differences were found in the definition of survival and in AIS coding. The current results give a clear indication of the attainability of information and may serve as a stepping-stone towards creation of a European trauma registry.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/eng
dc.titleCollecting core data in severely injured patients using a consensus trauma template: an international multicentre studyen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2011 Ringdal et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/cc10485
dc.identifier.cristin909711
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Health service and health administration research: 806eng


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY