Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLøkeland, Metteen_US
dc.contributor.authorIversen, Ole-Eriken_US
dc.contributor.authorEngeland, Andersen_US
dc.contributor.authorØkland, Ingriden_US
dc.contributor.authorBjørge, Lineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T13:00:52Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-09T08:36:10Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-10T10:46:03Z
dc.date.available2014-12-10T10:46:03Z
dc.date.issued2014-05-23eng
dc.identifier.issn0001-6349
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/8885
dc.description.abstractObjective. To evaluate the acceptability and efficacy of medical abortion at home up to 63 days’ gestation without limits on travel distance to a registered institution. Design. Observational prospective study. Setting. Haukeland University Hospital between May 2006 and May 2009. Population. A total of 1018 women requesting abortion before 63 days’ gestation who chose medical termination with mifepristone and home administration of misoprostol. Methods. The women took 200 mg mifepristone under nurse supervision and self-administered 800 lg misoprostol vaginally 36–48 h later at home. All were contacted by phone for follow-up and assessment of bleeding, pain and acceptability. Main outcome measures. Evacuation rate, pain, bleeding, acceptability, influence of distance on treatment. Results. Median gestational age was 50 (range 35– 63) days and 70 (7.1%) of the women lived more than 60 min travel from the clinic. The rate of completed abortion was 93.6% and surgical evacuation was performed in 50 (4.9%) cases. Two women requested treatment on the day of misoprostol use. Moderate to strong pain was experienced by 68.4%, and 74.7% reported moderate to heavy bleeding. Parous women experienced less pain than nulliparous women (odds ratio 0.27; 95% confidence interval 0.19–0.34). In all, 95.1% of the women were satisfied with staying at home. Travel distance did not influence treatment outcome variables. Conclusions. In our experience, home administration of misoprostol is an effective and acceptable method for abortion up to 63 days of gestation and women should be eligible for this treatment option regardless of their travel distance from hospital.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherWileyeng
dc.relation.ispartof<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/1956/15618" target="blank">Implementation of Medical Abortion in Norway 1998-2013</a>
dc.relation.urihttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.12398/pdfeng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NCeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/eng
dc.subjectHomeeng
dc.subjecttermination of pregnancyeng
dc.subjectmifepristoneeng
dc.subjectmisoprostoleng
dc.subjectacceptabilityeng
dc.subjecttravel distanceeng
dc.titleMedical abortion with mifepristone and home administration of misoprostol up to 63 days' gestationen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2014-12-08T13:00:52Zen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2014 The Authors
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12398
dc.identifier.cristin1148790
dc.source.journalActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
dc.source.4093
dc.source.147
dc.source.pagenumber647-653
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical sciences: 700::Clinical medical sciences: 750::Gynaecology and obstetrics: 756eng
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Gynekologi og obstetrikk: 756nob


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC