Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFan, Chaoran
dc.contributor.authorHauser, Helwig
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-13T12:53:54Z
dc.date.available2021-01-13T12:53:54Z
dc.date.created2020-03-06T16:01:14Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.PublishedIn: Archambault, D., Nabney, I. and Peltonen, J. (eds.), Machine Learning Methods in Visualisation for Big Dataen_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-03868-089-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2722780
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we investigate to which degree the human should be involved into the model design and how good the empirical model can be with more careful design. To find out, we extended our previously published Mahalanobis brush (the best current empirical model in terms of accuracy for brushing points in a scatterplot) by further incorporating the data distribution information that is captured by the kernel density estimation (KDE). Based on this work, we then include a short discussion between the empirical model, designed in detail by an expert and the deep learning-based model that is learned from user data directly.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherThe Eurographics Associationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMachine Learning Methods in Visualisation for Big Data 2019
dc.titleOn KDE-based brushing in scatterplots and how it compares to CNN-based brushingen_US
dc.typeChapteren_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 the authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.2312/mlvis.20191157
dc.identifier.cristin1800233


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel