Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMydske, Sigurd
dc.contributor.authorThomassen, Øyvind
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-12T09:50:33Z
dc.date.available2021-02-12T09:50:33Z
dc.date.created2020-08-24T09:44:15Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1757-7241
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2727643
dc.description.abstractBackground: Optimal prehospital management and treatment of patients with accidental hypothermia is a matter of frequent debate, with controversies usually revolving around the subject of rewarming. The rule of thumb in primary emergency care and first aid for patients with accidental hypothermia has traditionally been to be refrain from prehospital active rewarming and to focus on preventing further heat loss. The potential danger of active external rewarming in a prehospital setting has previously been generally accepted among the emergency medicine community based on a fear of potential complications, such as “afterdrop”, “rewarming syndrome”, and “circum-rescue collapse”. This has led to a reluctancy from health care providers to provide patients with active external rewarming outside the hospital. Different theories and hypotheses exist for these physiological phenomena, but the scientific evidence is limited. The research question is whether the prehospital use of active external rewarming is dangerous for patients with accidental hypothermia. This systematic review intends to describe the acute unfavourable adverse effects of active external rewarming on patients with accidental hypothermia. Methods: A literature search of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL], and SveMed+ was carried out, and all articles were screened for eligibility. All article formats were included. Results: Two thousand three hundred two articles were screened, and eight articles met our search criteria. Three articles were case reports or case series, one was a prospective study, two were retrospective studies, one article was a literature review, and one article was a war report from the Napoleonic Wars. Conclusions: One of the main findings in this article was the poor scientific quality and the low number of articles meeting our inclusion criteria. When conducting this review, we found no scientific evidence of acceptable quality to prove that the use of active external rewarming is dangerous for patients with accidental hypothermia in a prehospital setting. We found several articles claiming that active external rewarming is dangerous, but most of them do not cite references or provide evidence.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleIs prehospital use of active external warming dangerous for patients with accidental hypothermia: a systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright The Author(s). 2020en_US
dc.source.articlenumber77 (2020)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13049-020-00773-2
dc.identifier.cristin1824721
dc.source.journalScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.source.4028
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2020, 28:77.en_US
dc.source.volume28en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal