Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLeer-Salvesen, Sunniva
dc.contributor.authorDybvik, Eva Hansen
dc.contributor.authorRanhoff, Anette Hylen
dc.contributor.authorHusebø, Bjørn Liljestrand
dc.contributor.authorDahl, Ola Einar
dc.contributor.authorEngesæter, Lars B.
dc.contributor.authorGjertsen, Jan-Erik
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-25T10:59:28Z
dc.date.available2021-03-25T10:59:28Z
dc.date.created2020-11-07T15:56:52Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.PublishedEuropean Geriatric Medicine. 2020, 11 (4), 563-569.
dc.identifier.issn1878-7649
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2735499
dc.description.abstractPurpose The perioperative consequences of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in hip fracture patients are not sufficiently investigated. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether DOAC-users have delayed surgery compared to non-users. Secondarily, we studied whether length of hospital stay, mortality, reoperations and bleeding complications were influenced by the use of DOAC. Methods The medical records of 314 patients operated for a hip fracture between 2016 and 2017 in a single trauma center were assessed. Patients aged < 60 and patients using other forms of anticoagulation than DOACs were excluded. Patients were followed from admission to 6 months postoperatively. Surgical delay was defined as time from admission to surgery. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, transfusion rates, perioperative bleeding loss, postoperative wound ooze, mortality and risk of reoperation. The use of general versus neuraxial anaesthesia was registered. Continuous outcomes were analysed using Students t test, while categorical outcomes were expressed by Odds ratios. Results 47 hip fracture patients (15%) were using DOACs. No difference in surgical delay (29 vs 26 h, p = 0.26) or length of hospital stay (6.6 vs 6.1 days, p = 0.34) were found between DOAC-users and non-users. DOAC-users operated with neuraxial anaesthesia had longer surgical delay compared to DOAC-users operated with general anaesthesia (35 h vs 22 h, p < 0.001). Perioperative blood loss, transfusion rate, risk of bleeding complications and mortality were similar between groups. Conclusion Hip fracture patients using DOAC did not have increased surgical delay, length of stay or risk of reported bleeding complications than patients without anticoagulation prior to surgery. The increased surgical delay found for DOAC-users operated with neuraxial anaesthesia should be interpreted with caution.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleDo direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) cause delayed surgery, longer length of hospital stay, and poorer outcome for hip fracture patients?en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright The Author(s) 2020en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00319-w
dc.identifier.cristin1845852
dc.source.journalEuropean Geriatric Medicineen_US
dc.source.4011
dc.source.144
dc.source.pagenumber563–569en_US
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Geriatric Medicine. 2020, 11, 563–569.en_US
dc.source.volume11en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal