Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorJeno, Lucas Matias
dc.contributor.authorDettweiler, Ulrich
dc.contributor.authorGrytnes, John-Arvid
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-20T09:00:25Z
dc.date.available2021-04-20T09:00:25Z
dc.date.created2020-09-21T13:10:59Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.PublishedComputers & Education. 2020, 159, 104022en_US
dc.identifier.issn0360-1315
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2738545
dc.description.abstractIn this study we investigate the effect of manipulating intrinsic goals, relative to extrinsic goals, in a mobile learning tool and traditional textbook for biology students. Using Self- Determination Theory, we hypothesized that framing intrinsic goals in a need-supportive mobile learning app would enhance motivation, intentions, effort, and achievement, relative to extrinsic goals in a traditional tool (textbook). We randomized 128 undergraduate students learning to identify species in this 2 × 2 experiment. Using Bayesian analyses, results show a credible interaction effect between the mobile app and intrinsic goal-framing for intentions and identified regulation. For effort and achievement, the main effect of mobile learning is credible with substantial effect sizes. We argue that these findings are due to the need-supportive features within the mobile app and need-satisfying experience of pursuing intrinsic goals. For intrinsic motivation and amotivation, however, extrinsic goal-framing and intrinsic goal-framing, respectively, are credible and positive main effects, which is unexpected. More research is needed to investigate if this contradictory finding is replicated by others, or if students are pursuing extrinsic goals for autonomous motivation. Bayesian multigroup path analysis found across both groups that identified regulation predicted intentions, and intrinsic motivation predicted effort and achievement. For the extrinsic goal-framing group, amotivation predicted achievement, identified regulation predicted effort and achievement, and intrinsic motivation negatively predicted intentions. The results of our study provide theoretical implications for how goal-framing energizes different types of motivation within the mLearning context, and how manipulation within technology may have a differential effect on motivation than a physical agent.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe effects of a goal-framing and need-supportive app on undergraduates´ intentions, effort, and achievement in mobile science learningen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber104022en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104022
dc.identifier.cristin1831653
dc.source.journalComputers & Educationen_US
dc.source.40159en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 275681en_US
dc.identifier.citationComputers & Education. 2020, 159, 104022


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal