Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNygaard, Silje
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-26T11:48:21Z
dc.date.available2021-04-26T11:48:21Z
dc.date.created2020-05-12T18:50:21Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.PublishedJournalism Studies. 2020, 21 (6), 766-782.
dc.identifier.issn1461-670X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2739595
dc.description.abstractThrough a quantitative content analysis (n = 878), this study examines and compares intermedia agenda-setting between right-wing alternative media outlets and mainstream online newspapers in the Scandinavian countries of Norway, Sweden and Denmark. Scholars have described the process of intermedia agenda-setting as an instrument used to uphold news norms within the journalistic community. Giving issue attention to another news media institution is considered a validation of the first news media’s decision to report on a specific issue. This study, however, demonstrates how mainstream newspapers most often give issue attention to right-wing alternative media outlets in order to protect the boundaries of professional journalism as an institution as well as the limits of the debate from actors that are perceived as both journalistically and ideologically deviant. Regarding differences between the three countries, the findings reveal that the intermedia agenda-setting influence of alternative media outlets is higher in countries where populist actors are placed within “the sphere of legitimate controversy” (Norway and Denmark) than in countries where populist actors are banished to “the sphere of deviance” (Sweden).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleBoundary Work: Intermedia Agenda-Setting Between Right-Wing Alternative Media and Professional Journalismen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Author(s).en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1461670X.2020.1722731
dc.identifier.cristin1810633
dc.source.journalJournalism Studiesen_US
dc.source.4021
dc.source.146
dc.source.pagenumber766-782en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 250598en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournalism Studies. 2020, 21 (6), 766-782.en_US
dc.source.volume21en_US
dc.source.issue6en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal