Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGrøtvedt, Liv
dc.contributor.authorEgeland, Grace M.
dc.contributor.authorKvalvik, Liv Grimstvedt
dc.contributor.authorMadsen, Christian
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T07:13:53Z
dc.date.available2021-05-14T07:13:53Z
dc.date.created2020-12-18T14:21:56Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.PublishedBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020, 20 1-11.
dc.identifier.issn1471-2393
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2755246
dc.description.abstractBackground The Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN) provides national coverage of all births. While retrieval of most of the information in the birth records is mandatory, mothers may refrain to provide information on her smoking status. The proportion of women with unknown smoking status varied greatly over time, between hospitals, and by demographic groups. We investigated if incomplete data on smoking in the MBRN may have contributed to a biased smoking prevalence. Methods In a study population of all 904,982 viable and singleton births during 1999–2014, we investigated main predictor variables influencing the unknown smoking status of the mothers’ using linear multivariable regression. Thereafter, we applied machine learning to predict annual smoking prevalence (95% CI) in the same group of unknown smoking status, assuming missing-not-at-random. Results Overall, the proportion of women with unknown smoking status was 14.4%. Compared to the Nordic country region of origin, women from Europe outside the Nordic region had 15% (95% CI 12–17%) increased adjusted risk to have unknown smoking status. Correspondingly, the increased risks for women from Asia was 17% (95% CI 15–19%) and Africa 26% (95% CI 23–29%). The most important machine learning prediction variables regarding maternal smoking were education, ethnic background, marital status and birth weight. We estimated a change from the annual observed smoking prevalence among the women with known smoking status in the range of − 5.5 to 1.1% when combining observed and predicted smoking prevalence. Conclusion The predicted total smoking prevalence was only marginally modified compared to the observed prevalence in the group with known smoking status. This implies that MBRN-data may be trusted for health surveillance and research.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleEvaluation of incomplete maternal smoking data using machine learning algorithms: a study from the Medical Birth Registry of Norwayen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright The Author(s). 2020en_US
dc.source.articlenumber710en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12884-020-03384-y
dc.identifier.cristin1861648
dc.source.journalBMC Pregnancy and Childbirthen_US
dc.source.4020
dc.identifier.citationBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020, 20, 710.en_US
dc.source.volume20en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal