Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHellesund, Tone
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-30T09:26:26Z
dc.date.available2021-06-30T09:26:26Z
dc.date.created2020-11-10T09:36:53Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.PublishedGender & History. 2020, .
dc.identifier.issn0953-5233
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2762511
dc.description.abstractAuthenticity and intimacy have become key expectations in contemporary romantic relationships. At the same time, it is taken for granted that sex forms a part of such relationships. This article explores how the relationship between sex, authenticity and intimacy was written about and negotiated in the Norwegian community of lesbian radical feminists in the 1970s and 1980s. The construction of male sexuality as fundamentally and inherently different from female sexuality in the periodicals of the lesbian movement made thinking and writing about women's sexual desire and genital sex difficult. This article further argues that the concept of genital sex potentially conflicted with the notions of authenticity and intimacy pursued by the lesbian radical feminist community. While authenticity and intimacy were constructed as preferable companions to sex in the New Left and in large parts of the women's movement, the Norwegian lesbian radical feminists often constructed authenticity and intimacy in opposition to genital sex.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleBetter than Orgasm: Sex, Authenticity and Intimacy in the New Women's Movement in Norwayen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authoren_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1468-0424.12502
dc.identifier.cristin1846410
dc.source.journalGender & Historyen_US
dc.source.pagenumber209-226en_US
dc.identifier.citationGender & History. 2021, 33(1), 209-226en_US
dc.source.volume33en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal