Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEregata, Getachew Teshome
dc.contributor.authorHailu, Alemayehu
dc.contributor.authorGeletu, Zelalem Adugna
dc.contributor.authorMemirie, Solomon Tessema
dc.contributor.authorJohansson, Kjell Arne
dc.contributor.authorStenberg, Karin
dc.contributor.authorBertram, Melanie Y.
dc.contributor.authorAman, Amir
dc.contributor.authorNorheim, Ole Frithjof
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-05T11:59:20Z
dc.date.available2021-07-05T11:59:20Z
dc.date.created2021-01-16T11:41:33Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2328-8604
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2763405
dc.description.abstractTo make progress toward universal health coverage, countries should define the type and mix of health services that respond to their populations’ needs. Ethiopia revised its essential health services package (EHSP) in 2019. This paper describes the process, methodology and key features of the new EHSP. A total of 35 consultative workshops were convened with experts and the public to define the scope of the revision, develop a list of health interventions, agree on the prioritization criteria, gather evidence and compare health interventions. Seven prioritization criteria were employed: disease burden, cost effectiveness, equity, financial risk protection, budget impact, public acceptability and political acceptability. In the first phase, 1,749 interventions were identified, including existing and new interventions, which were regrouped and reorganized to identify 1,442 interventions as relevant. The second phase removed interventions that did not match the burden of disease or were not relevant in the Ethiopian setting, reducing the number of interventions to 1,018. These were evaluated further and ranked by the other criteria. Finally, 594 interventions were classified as high priority (58%), 213 as medium priorities (21%) and 211 as low priority interventions (21%). The current policy is to provide 570 interventions (56%) free of charge while guaranteeing the availability of the remaining services with cost-sharing (38%) and cost-recovery (6%) mechanisms in place. In conclusion, the revision of Ethiopia’s EHSP followed a participatory, inclusive and evidence-based prioritization process. The interventions included in the EHSP were comprehensive and were assigned to health care delivery platforms and linked to financing mechanisms.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleRevision of the Ethiopian Essential Health Service Package: An Explication of the Process and Methods Useden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 the authorsen_US
dc.source.articlenumbere1829313en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/23288604.2020.1829313
dc.identifier.cristin1872492
dc.source.journalHealth Systems & Reformen_US
dc.identifier.citationHealth Systems & Reform. 2020, 6 (1), e1829313.en_US
dc.source.volume6en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal