Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorJeddi, Zeinab
dc.contributor.authorVoss, Peter H.
dc.contributor.authorSørensen, Mathilde B.
dc.contributor.authorDanielsen, Finn
dc.contributor.authorDahl-Jensen, Trine
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Tine B.
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, G.
dc.contributor.authorHansen, A.
dc.contributor.authorJakobsen, P.
dc.contributor.authorFrederiksen, P.O.
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-05T11:26:49Z
dc.date.available2021-08-05T11:26:49Z
dc.date.created2020-12-22T09:00:48Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2296-6463
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2766489
dc.description.abstractLandslides, earthquakes and other natural disasters are expected to increase in the Arctic, yet our ability to make informed decisions about safety is tightly limited by lack of data. As part of the Integrated Arctic Observation System (INTAROS) project, geophones were installed by residents in Greenland and by University of Bergen in Svalbard in 2018. The purpose of the installations was to explore challenges and benefits of community-based data collection for seismological monitoring in the Arctic region. Raspberry Shake units with one/three-component velocity sensors were selected for the deployment, due to their user-friendly configuration, easy installation, and well established digital platform and web services. The purpose of engaging community members in the use of geophone sensors was to monitor earthquakes, cryoseisms (events generated by ice mass), and landslides. We report our findings with respect to challenges regarding the installation and operation of the Raspberry Shake sensors at both locations. Connecting community-based recordings with permanent seismological networks improved both the detection capability and the data support for understanding seismic events in Greenland. In contrast, finding suitable locations for deployments in Longyearbyen turned out to be challenging, because most buildings are constructed on poles due to the permafrost and indoor space is expensive. Promoting citizen seismology in the Arctic could improve monitoring of seismic events in the Arctic while simultaneously raising community awareness of natural hazards.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrontiersen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCitizen Seismology in the Arcticen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.articlenumber139en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/feart.2020.00139
dc.identifier.cristin1862570
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Earth Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Earth Science. 2020, 8, 139en_US
dc.source.volume8en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal