Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSlåtsve, Kristina Barbara
dc.contributor.authorClaudi, Tor
dc.contributor.authorLappegård, Knut Tore
dc.contributor.authorJenum, Anne Karen
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Marthe
dc.contributor.authorNøkleby, Kjersti
dc.contributor.authorCooper, John
dc.contributor.authorSandberg, Sverre
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Tore Julsrud
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-13T06:42:59Z
dc.date.available2021-08-13T06:42:59Z
dc.date.created2021-06-21T11:55:38Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0742-3071
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2767671
dc.description.abstractAims The objectives of this study are to identify the proportion and characteristics of people with type 1 and 2 diabetes treated in primary, specialist and shared care and to identify the proportion of persons with type 2 diabetes reaching HbA1c treatment targets and the clinical risk factors and general practitioner and practice characteristics associated with treatment in specialist care. Methods Population-based cross-sectional study including all adults ≥18 years diagnosed with diabetes in primary and specialist care in Salten, Norway. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models with level of care as outcome variable and population, general practitioner, and practice characteristics as exposure variables. Results Of 2704 people with type 2 diabetes, 13.5% were treated in shared care and 2.1% in specialist care only. Of 305 people with type 1 diabetes, 14.4% received treatment in primary care only. The HbA1c treatment target of 53 mmol/mol (7.0%) was reached by 67.3% of people with type 2 diabetes in primary care versus 30.4% in specialist care. HbA1c, use of insulin, coronary heart disease, retinopathy and urban practice location were positively associated with treatment in specialist care. General practitioners’ use of a structured form and a diabetes nurse were negatively associated with specialist care. Conclusions Of people with type 2 diabetes, 16% were treated in specialist care. They had higher HbA1c and more vascular complications, as expected from priority guidelines. The use of a structured diabetes form and diabetes nurses seem to support type 2 diabetes follow-up in primary care.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleFactors associated with treatment in primary versus specialist care: A population-based study of people with type 2 and type 1 diabetesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.articlenumbere14580en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/dme.14580
dc.identifier.cristin1917213
dc.source.journalDiabetic Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citationDiabetic Medicine. 2021, 38 (7), e14580.en_US
dc.source.volume38en_US
dc.source.issue7en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal