Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLudvigsen, Trine
dc.contributor.authorMatre, Kjell
dc.contributor.authorGudmundsdottir, Rakel Sif
dc.contributor.authorKrukhaug, Yngvar
dc.contributor.authorDybvik, Eva Hansen
dc.contributor.authorFevang, Jonas Meling
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-18T08:29:42Z
dc.date.available2021-08-18T08:29:42Z
dc.date.created2021-07-07T11:47:13Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0021-9355
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2770012
dc.description.abstractBackground: The use of volar locking plate fixation (VLP) for unstable extra-articular distal radial fractures has increased in the last decades. External fixation (EF) is less frequently used. This change of surgical approach has only to some extent been evidence-based. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, we compared VLP and EF in patients between 18 and 70 years of age who had a displaced extra-articular distal radial fracture (OTA/AO type A3). The patients were examined at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation score (PRWHE). Secondary outcomes were the shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), pain score on a visual analog scale (VAS), and radiographic measurements. Range of motion, grip strength, finger stiffness, complications, and reoperations were also recorded. Results: One hundred and fifty-six patients were included. One hundred and forty-two (91%)—127 women (89%) and 15 men (11%)—completed 1 year of follow-up. Sixty-nine patients were treated with VLP and 73, with EF. The mean age was 56 years. At 6 weeks, the median PRWHE score was significantly higher in the EF group (44) compared with the VLP group (27) (p < 0.001). At 3 months and 1 year, the difference between groups was not significant. The median QuickDASH score was 27 in the VLP group and 43 in the EF group at 6 weeks (p < 0.001), and a significant difference persisted at 3 months (p = 0.023). The VLP group had superior results in terms pain during activity, wrist extension, and ulnar and radial deviation at 1 year, whereas the number of major complications was similar in the 2 groups. Conclusions: Patients treated with VLP had earlier recovery of function compared with patients treated with EF. One year postoperatively, we found no significant functional difference.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSurgical Treatment of Distal Radial Fractures with External Fixation Versus Volar Locking Plate A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trialen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.2106/JBJS.20.00275
dc.identifier.cristin1920661
dc.source.journalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American volumeen_US
dc.source.pagenumber405-414en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2021, 103 (5), 405-414.en_US
dc.source.volume103en_US
dc.source.issue5en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal