Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHagen, Kristin Gjerde
dc.contributor.authorStrandenes, Geir
dc.contributor.authorKristoffersen, Einar Klæboe
dc.contributor.authorBraathen, Hanne
dc.contributor.authorSivertsen, Joar
dc.contributor.authorBjerkvig, Christopher Kalhagen
dc.contributor.authorSommerfelt-Pettersen, Nina Grindheim
dc.contributor.authorAasheim, Irmelin Beathe
dc.contributor.authorLunde, Turid Helen Felli
dc.contributor.authorHervig, Tor
dc.contributor.authorApelseth, Torunn Oveland
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-29T10:00:54Z
dc.date.available2021-11-29T10:00:54Z
dc.date.created2021-10-19T21:20:12Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0041-1132
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2831842
dc.description.abstractBackground: Civilian and military guidelines recommend early balanced transfusion to patients with life-threatening bleeding. Low titer group O whole blood was introduced as the primary blood product for resuscitation of massive hemorrhage at Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, in December 2017. In this report, we describe the whole blood program and present results from the first years of routine use. Study design and methods: Patients who received whole blood from December 2017 to April 2020 were included in our quality registry for massive transfusions. Post-transfusion blood samples were collected to analyze isohemagglutinin (anti-A/-B) and hemolysis markers. Administration of other blood products, transfusion reactions, and patient survival (days 1 and 30) were recorded. User experiences were surveyed for both clinical and laboratory staff. Results: Two hundred and five patients (64% male and 36% female) received 836 units in 226 transfusion episodes. Patients received a mean of 3.7 units (range 1–35) in each transfusion episode. The main indications for transfusion were trauma (26%), gastrointestinal (22%), cardiothoracic/vascular (18%), surgical (18%), obstetric (11%), and medical (5%) bleeding. There was no difference in survival between patients with blood type O when compared with non-group O. Haptoglobin level was lower in the transfusion episodes for non-O group patients, however no clinical hemolysis was reported. No patients had conclusive transfusion-associated adverse events. Both clinical and laboratory staff preferred whole blood to component therapy for massive transfusion. Discussion: The experience from Haukeland University Hospital indicates that whole blood is feasible, safe, and effective for in-hospital treatment of bleeding.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA whole blood based resuscitation strategy in civilian medical services: Experience from a Norwegian hospital in the period 2017–2020en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 the authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/trf.16490
dc.identifier.cristin1947145
dc.source.journalTransfusionen_US
dc.source.pagenumberS22-S31en_US
dc.identifier.citationTransfusion. 2021, 61 (S1), S22-S31.en_US
dc.source.volume61en_US
dc.source.issueS1en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal