Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorReistad, Jone Peter
dc.contributor.authorLaundal, Karl Magnus
dc.contributor.authorØstgaard, Nikolai
dc.contributor.authorOhma, Anders
dc.contributor.authorBurrell, Angeline G.
dc.contributor.authorHatch, Spencer Mark
dc.contributor.authorHåland, Stein Egil
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Evan G.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-27T12:32:13Z
dc.date.available2022-01-27T12:32:13Z
dc.date.created2021-12-22T11:54:51Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2169-9380
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2888215
dc.description.abstractLobe reconnection is usually thought to play an important role in geospace dynamics only when the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) is mainly northward. This is because the most common and unambiguous signature of lobe reconnection is the strong sunward convection in the polar cap ionosphere observed during these conditions. During more typical conditions, when the IMF is mainly oriented in a dawn-dusk direction, plasma flows initiated by dayside and lobe reconnection both map to high-latitude ionospheric locations in close proximity to each other on the dayside. This makes the distinction of the source of the observed dayside polar cap convection ambiguous, as the flow magnitude and direction are similar from the two topologically different source regions. We here overcome this challenge by normalizing the ionospheric convection observed by the Super Dual Aurora Radar Network (SuperDARN) to the polar cap boundary, inferred from simultaneous observations from the Active Magnetosphere and Planetary Electrodynamics Response Experiment (AMPERE). This new method enable us to separate and quantify the relative contribution of both lobe reconnection and dayside/nightside (Dungey cycle) reconnection during periods of dominating IMF By. Our main findings are twofold. First, the lobe reconnection rate can typically account for 20% of the Dungey cycle flux transport during local summer when IMF By is dominating and IMF Bz ≥ 0. Second, the dayside convection relative to the open/closed boundary is vastly different in local summer versus local winter, as defined by the dipole tilt angle.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleQuantifying the Lobe Reconnection Rate During Dominant IMF By Periods and Different Dipole Tilt Orientationsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021. The Authorsen_US
dc.source.articlenumbere2021JA029742en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2021JA029742
dc.identifier.cristin1971420
dc.source.journalJournal of Geophysical Research (JGR): Space Physicsen_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 223252en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 2021, 126 (11), e2021JA029742.en_US
dc.source.volume126en_US
dc.source.issue11en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal