Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFraggetta, Filippo
dc.contributor.authorL'Imperio, Vincenzo
dc.contributor.authorAmeisen, David
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Rita
dc.contributor.authorLeh, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorKiehl, Tim-Rasmus
dc.contributor.authorSerbanescu, Mircea
dc.contributor.authorRacoceanu, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorMea, Vincenzo Della
dc.contributor.authorPolonia, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorZerbe, Norman
dc.contributor.authorEloy, Catarina
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-28T13:53:25Z
dc.date.available2022-01-28T13:53:25Z
dc.date.created2022-01-10T12:11:23Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2075-4418
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2942149
dc.description.abstractThe interest in implementing digital pathology (DP) workflows to obtain whole slide image (WSI) files for diagnostic purposes has increased in the last few years. The increasing performance of technical components and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of systems for primary diagnosis led to increased interest in applying DP workflows. However, despite this revolutionary transition, real world data suggest that a fully digital approach to the histological workflow has been implemented in only a minority of pathology laboratories. The objective of this study is to facilitate the implementation of DP workflows in pathology laboratories, helping those involved in this process of transformation to identify: (a) the scope and the boundaries of the DP transformation; (b) how to introduce automation to reduce errors; (c) how to introduce appropriate quality control to guarantee the safety of the process and (d) the hardware and software needed to implement DP systems inside the pathology laboratory. The European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP) provided consensus-based recommendations developed through discussion among members of the Scientific Committee. The recommendations are thus based on the expertise of the panel members and on the agreement obtained after virtual meetings. Prior to publication, the recommendations were reviewed by members of the ESDIP Board. The recommendations comprehensively cover every step of the implementation of the digital workflow in the anatomic pathology department, emphasizing the importance of interoperability, automation and tracking of the entire process before the introduction of a scanning facility. Compared to the available national and international guidelines, the present document represents a practical, handy reference for the correct implementation of the digital workflow in Europe.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleBest Practice Recommendations for the Implementation of a Digital Pathology Workflow in the Anatomic Pathology Laboratory by the European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP)en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 by the authorsen_US
dc.source.articlenumber2167en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/diagnostics11112167
dc.identifier.cristin1977436
dc.source.journalDiagnosticsen_US
dc.identifier.citationDiagnostics. 2021, 11 (11), 2167.en_US
dc.source.volume11en_US
dc.source.issue11en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal