Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorØstgaard, Nikolai
dc.contributor.authorCummer, S.A.
dc.contributor.authorMezentsev, Andrey
dc.contributor.authorLuque, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorDwyer, J.
dc.contributor.authorNeubert, Torsten
dc.contributor.authorReglero, Victor
dc.contributor.authorMarisaldi, Martino
dc.contributor.authorKochkin, Pavlo
dc.contributor.authorSarria, David Alexandre Stephan
dc.contributor.authorLehtinen, Nikolai Grigorievich
dc.contributor.authorUllaland, Kjetil
dc.contributor.authorYang, Shiming
dc.contributor.authorGenov, Georgi
dc.contributor.authorChanrion, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorChristiansen, Freddy
dc.contributor.authorPu, Y.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-16T13:39:06Z
dc.date.available2022-03-16T13:39:06Z
dc.date.created2022-01-25T13:53:12Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2169-897X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2985601
dc.description.abstractOn February 8, 2019, the Atmosphere-Space Interaction Monitor observed a terrestrial gamma-ray flash (TGF) and an Elve from a positive intracloud (+IC) lightning during the initial breakdown stage of a lightning flash north east of Puerto Rico. A second Elve produced by the return stroke (RS) of a negative cloud-to-ground (−CG) lightning was observed 456 ms later about 300 km south of the first one. Radio measurements show that a short (30 μs) and large (280 kA km) energetic in-cloud pulse (EIP) produced the electromagnetic (EM) wave for the first Elve while the RS of the −CG was the EM source for the second Elve. Assuming that the EIP and the RS were the sources of the 777 nm emissions, both the delay relative to the ultra-violet pulse and the shape and duration of the 777 nm emissions can be explained by scattering and absorption inside the clouds. The TGF produced by the +IC lightning had the same duration as the EIP (∼30 μs). Due to the ±80 μs timing uncertainty of the TGF, we can only state that TGF was produced just before or most likely simultaneously with the EIP. The large 777 nm pulse indicates that a large part of the EIP was produced by a current flowing in a hot channel, but it is likely that the TGF current also contributed significantly to the EIP.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSimultaneous Observations of EIP, TGF, Elve, and Optical Lightningen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021. The Authorsen_US
dc.source.articlenumbere2020JD033921en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2020JD033921
dc.identifier.cristin1989555
dc.source.journalJournal of Geophysical Research (JGR): Atmospheresen_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2021, 126 (11), e2020JD033921.en_US
dc.source.volume126en_US
dc.source.issue11en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal