Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPejovic, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorCavallin, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorMpamize, Allan
dc.contributor.authorLubulwa, Clare
dc.contributor.authorHöök, Susanna Myrnerts
dc.contributor.authorByamugisha, Josaphat
dc.contributor.authorNankunda, Jolly
dc.contributor.authorTylleskär, Thorkild
dc.contributor.authorTrevisanuto, Daniele
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-04T12:59:37Z
dc.date.available2022-04-04T12:59:37Z
dc.date.created2021-11-23T14:31:54Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0300-9572
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2989672
dc.description.abstractObjective To evaluate the respiratory function of asphyxiated infants resuscitated with i-gel supraglottic airway (SGA) vs. face mask (FM) in a low-resource setting. Methods In this sub-study from the NeoSupra trial, respiratory function during the first 60 inflations was evaluated in 46 neonates (23 with SGA and 23 with FM) at the Mulago National Referral Hospital, Uganda. The primary outcome was the mask leak (%). The secondary outcomes included inspired (VTi) and expired (VTe) tidal volumes, and heart rate response to ventilation. Results Median mask leak was 40% (IQR 22–52) with SGA and 39% (IQR 26–62) with FM (p = 0.38). Median VTe was 7.8 ml/kg (IQR 5.6–10.2) with SGA and 7.3 ml/kg (IQR 4.8–11.9) with FM (p = 0.84), while median VTi was 15.4 ml/kg (IQR 11–4-17.6) with SGA and 15.9 ml/kg (IQR 9.0–22.6) with FM (p = 0.68). A shorter time was needed to achieve heart rate > 100 bpm in SGA (median 13 s IQR 9–15) with respect to FM arm (median 61, IQR 33–140) (p = 0.0002). Conclusion Respiratory function was not statistically different between neonates resuscitated with SGA vs. FM. SGA was associated with faster heart rate recovery compared to FM in the subgroup of neonates with bradycardia. Further research is needed to investigate possible advantages of SGA on respiratory function at birth.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleRespiratory monitoring during neonatal resuscitation using a supraglottic airway device vs. a face masken_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 Elsevieren_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.10.025
dc.identifier.cristin1957892
dc.source.journalResuscitationen_US
dc.source.pagenumber107-113en_US
dc.identifier.citationResuscitation. 2021, 171, 107-113.en_US
dc.source.volume171en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal