Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCoşkun, Abdurrahman
dc.contributor.authorAarsand, Aasne Karine
dc.contributor.authorSandberg, Sverre
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Elena
dc.contributor.authorLocatelli, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Garzón, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorFernandez-Calle, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorCeriotti, Ferruccio
dc.contributor.authorJonker, Niels
dc.contributor.authorBartlett, William A.
dc.contributor.authorCarobene, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-20T12:54:07Z
dc.date.available2022-04-20T12:54:07Z
dc.date.created2021-07-28T16:50:22Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1434-6621
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2991662
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Reliable biological variation (BV) data are required for the clinical use of tumor markers in the diagnosis and monitoring of treatment effects in cancer. The European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS) was established by the EFLM Biological Variation Working Group to deliver BV data for clinically important measurands. In this study, EuBIVAS-based BV estimates are provided for cancer antigen (CA) 125, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin-19 fragment, alpha‐fetoprotein and human epididymis protein 4. Methods: Subjects from five European countries were enrolled in the study, and weekly samples were collected from 91 healthy individuals (53 females and 38 males; 21–69 years old) for 10 consecutive weeks. All samples were analyzed in duplicate within a single run. After excluding outliers and homogeneity analysis, the BVs of tumor markers were determined by CV-ANOVA on trend-corrected data, when relevant (Røraas method). Results: Marked individuality was found for all tumor markers. CYFRA 21-1 was the measurand with the highest index of individuality (II) at 0.67, whereas CA 19-9 had the lowest II at 0.07. The CV I s of HE4, CYFRA 21-1, CA 19-9, CA 125 and CA 15-3 of pre- and postmenopausal females were significantly different from each other. Conclusions: This study provides updated BV estimates for several tumor markers, and the findings indicate that marked individuality is characteristic. The use of reference change values should be considered when monitoring treatment of patients by means of tumor markers.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDe Gruyteren_US
dc.titleWithin- and between-subject biological variation data for tumor markers based on the European Biological Variation Studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 Walter de Gruyteren_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/cclm-2021-0283
dc.identifier.cristin1922902
dc.source.journalClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicineen_US
dc.source.pagenumber543-552en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2022, 60 (4), 543-552.en_US
dc.source.volume60en_US
dc.source.issue4en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel