Logic of Justified Beliefs Based on Argumentation
Journal article, Peer reviewed
MetadataVis full innførsel
OriginalversjonErkenntnis: An International Journal of Scientific Philosophy. 2021. 10.1007/s10670-021-00399-5
This manuscript presents a topological argumentation framework for modelling notions of evidence-based (i.e., justified) belief. Our framework relies on so-called topological evidence models to represent the pieces of evidence that an agent has at her disposal, and it uses abstract argumentation theory to select the pieces of evidence that the agent will use to define her beliefs. The tools from abstract argumentation theory allow us to model agents who make decisions in the presence of contradictory information. Thanks to this, it is possible to define two new notions of beliefs, grounded beliefs and fully grounded beliefs. These notions are discussed in this paper, analysed and compared with the existing notion of topological justified belief. This comparison revolves around three main issues: closure under conjunction introduction, the level of consistency and their logical strength.
Postponed access: the file will be available after 2022-06-15