Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDalen, Kristin
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T08:54:53Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T08:54:53Z
dc.date.created2022-02-15T09:23:20Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1369-6866
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2993126
dc.description.abstractSocial policies in China have expanded rapidly since the early 2000s, broadening welfare provisions aiming to improve citizens’ well-being in a context of rapid development and increasing inequality. How people see the role of the government in the provision of welfare is important to policy-making in an authoritarianstate, such as China, because regime legitimacy is tied to evaluations of government performance. To what extent have welfare attitudes changed as a new Chinese social security system has emerged? Drawing on nationally representative datasets from the China Inequality and Distributive Justice Survey Project for 2004, 2009 and 2014, this study finds that support for government provision of welfare has increased substantially within all population groups since 2004. Furthermore, traditional social cleavages, such as the urban–rural divide, seem to lose strength as a predictor of redistributive preference, possibly ‘deactivating’ these social cleavages as vehicles of political mobilisation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleChanging Attitudes towards Government Responsibility for Social Welfare in China between 2004-2014: Evidence from Three National Surveysen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 the authoren_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12511
dc.identifier.cristin2001636
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Social Welfareen_US
dc.source.pagenumber248-262en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 225132en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Sammenlignende politikk: 241en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Comparative politics: 241en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Social Welfare. 2022, 31 (2), 248-262.en_US
dc.source.volume31en_US
dc.source.issue2en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal