Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKamøy, Bjørnar
dc.contributor.authorMagnø, Morten Scherven
dc.contributor.authorTellefsen Nøland, Sara Julie Maria
dc.contributor.authorMoe, Morten Carsten
dc.contributor.authorPetrovski, Goran
dc.contributor.authorVehof, Jelle
dc.contributor.authorUtheim, Tor Paaske
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-07T12:50:35Z
dc.date.available2022-06-07T12:50:35Z
dc.date.created2022-02-16T14:00:48Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1755-375X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2997737
dc.description.abstractBackground: Dry eye disease (DED) is a common cause of ocular pain and discomfort. Dry eye disease (DED) stems from a loss-of-tear film homeostasis and is frequently seen in video display terminal (VDT) users. Video display terminal (VDT) use reduces blink rates and increases incomplete blinks, leading to tear film instability and ocular inflammation, promoting DED. Purpose: To assess and evaluate the methods for preventing VDT-associated DED and ocular discomfort. Methods: Studies were found using PubMed and Embase with the search terms: (digital visual terminal* OR computer use OR screen use OR smartphone OR display OR visual display terminal* OR computer vision syndrome OR tablet OR phone OR screen time) AND (dry eye OR DED). Results: Thirty-one relevant articles were found. Ten described single-visit studies, whereas 21 had a prolonged follow-up. Most preventive measures of VDT-associated DED aimed to increase blink rate or directly prevent tear film instability, ocular inflammation, mucin loss or ocular surface damage. Using an adjustable chair and ergonomic training, blink animations and omega-3 supplementation improved signs and symptoms of VDT-associated DED. Taking frequent breaks was associated with fewer symptoms, but no study assessed the commonly suggested 20-20-20 rule. Conclusion: Preventive measures, such as blink animation programmes, oral intake of omega-3 fatty acids and improved ergonomics act on different parts of the vicious cycle of dry eye and could supplement each other. A comparison of the efficacy of the different interventions as well as more evidence of the effect of increased humidity, VDT filters and ergonomic practices, are required.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleVideo display terminal use and dry eye: preventive measures and future perspectivesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/aos.15105
dc.identifier.cristin2002394
dc.source.journalActa Ophthalmologicaen_US
dc.source.pagenumber723-739
dc.identifier.citationActa Ophthalmologica. 2022, 100 (7), 723-739.en_US
dc.source.volume100
dc.source.issue7


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal