Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKørner, Hartwig
dc.contributor.authorGuren, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Inger Kristin
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Dagny Renata Faksvåg
dc.contributor.authorSøreide, Kjetil
dc.contributor.authorKørner, Leif Roland
dc.contributor.authorSøreide, Jon Arne
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T09:11:12Z
dc.date.available2022-09-14T09:11:12Z
dc.date.created2022-08-30T14:07:58Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0748-7983
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3017748
dc.description.abstractBackground: Treatment options for advanced and metastatic rectal cancer have increased during the past decades. However, a considerable proportion of the patients are not eligible for curative treatment, and data on this subset are scarce from a population-based perspective. This study aimed to describe treatment pathways and survival in a national cohort of patients with primary stage IV rectal cancer or stage I-III rectal cancer not eligible for curative treatment. Methods: A national cohort of all patients reported 2008–2015 to the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Registry with primary metastatic rectal cancer or who did not undergo curative resections for stage I-III rectal cancer was studied with regard to patient characteristics, treatments, and survival. Results: Of 8291 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer, 3304 (39.9%) were eligible for analysis. The majority (76.8%) had metastatic disease, and 23.2% did not undergo curative resections for other reasons. We identified four main treatment journeys: no tumour-directed treatment, 25.1%; resection of the primary tumour, 44.6%; oncological treatment, 28.4%; and R0 resection of the primary tumour and metastases, 1.9%; these translated into ten different treatment pathways. Survival differed considerably between a median of 5.3 months for M1 disease with non-tumour-directed treatment to a five-year survival of 67% for M1 with R0 resection. Conclusion: Almost 40% of all patients with rectal cancer did not enter a curative-intent treatment pathway. The patient journeys and outcomes varied greatly. This large but understudied population warrants further in-depth analyses of treatment efficacy and effects on quality of life.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCharacteristics and fate of patients with rectal cancer not entering a curative-intent treatment pathway: A complete nationwide registry cohort of 3,304 patientsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 the authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejso.2022.04.013
dc.identifier.cristin2047238
dc.source.journalEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncologyen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1831-1839en_US
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2022, 48 (8), 1831-1839.en_US
dc.source.volume48en_US
dc.source.issue8en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal