Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNygård, Mari
dc.contributor.authorEngesæter, Birgit Øvstebø
dc.contributor.authorCastle, Philip E.
dc.contributor.authorBerland, Jannicke
dc.contributor.authorEide, Maj Liv
dc.contributor.authorIversen, Ole-Erik
dc.contributor.authorJonassen, Christine M
dc.contributor.authorChristiansen, Irene Kraus
dc.contributor.authorVintermyr, Olav Karsten
dc.contributor.authorTrope, Ameli
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-30T11:36:59Z
dc.date.available2022-09-30T11:36:59Z
dc.date.created2022-09-17T17:05:35Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1055-9965
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3022883
dc.description.abstractBackground: Cervical cancer screening programs are facing a programmatic shift where screening protocol based on human papillomavirus testing (HPV-Screening protocol) is replacing the liquid-based cytology (LBC-Screening protocol). For safe technology transfer within the nationwide screening programme in Norway, HPV-Screening protocol was implemented randomized to compare the real-world effectiveness of HPV-Screening protocol and LBC-Screening protocol at the first screening round. Methods: Among 302,295 women ages 34 to 69 years scheduled to attend screening from February 2015 to June 2017, 157,447 attended. A total of 77,207 were randomly allocated to the HPV-Screening protocol and 80,240 were allocated to the LBC-Screening protocol. All women were followed up for 18 months. Results: The HPV-Screening protocol resulted in a relative increase of 60% in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse [risk ratio (RR) = 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.5–1.7], 40% in CIN grade 3 or worse (RR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.3–1.6), 40% in cancer (RR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.0–2.1), and 60% in colposcopy referrals (RR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.5–1.6) compared with LBC-Screening. The performance of both protocols was age dependent, being more effective in women ages under 50 years. Conclusions: The HPV-Screening protocol was well accepted by women in Norway and detected more CIN2, CIN3, and cancers compared with the LBC-Screening protocol. Impact: A randomized implementation of the HPV-Screening protocol with real-world assessment enabled a gradual, quality assured, and safe technology transition. HPV-based screening protocol may further be improved by using HPV genotyping and age-specific referral algorithms.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAACRen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleRandomized implementation of a primary human papillomavirus testing-based cervical cancer screening protocol for women 34 to 69 years in Norwayen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0340
dc.identifier.cristin2052686
dc.source.journalCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Preventionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1812-1822en_US
dc.identifier.citationCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. 2022, 31 (9), 1812-1822.en_US
dc.source.volume31en_US
dc.source.issue9en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal