Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCastro Tejera, Valeria
dc.contributor.authorÖhman, Lena
dc.contributor.authorAabakken, Lars
dc.contributor.authorFellström, Bengt
dc.contributor.authorHausken, Trygve
dc.contributor.authorHovde, Øistein
dc.contributor.authorHreinsson, Johann P.
dc.contributor.authorLindberg, Greger
dc.contributor.authorVenge, Per
dc.contributor.authorSimrén, Magnus
dc.contributor.authorTörnblom, Hans
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T11:49:29Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T11:49:29Z
dc.date.created2022-10-24T13:54:36Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0269-2813
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3028862
dc.description.abstractBackground Low-grade immune activation in the gut is a potential treatment target in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Aims To determine improvement in IBS symptoms after mesalazine treatment, and the utility of measures of immune activity in the rectal mucosa Methods This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, multicentre trial in subjects with IBS (Rome III criteria), with an eight-week treatment period of mesalazine 2400 mg or plcebo once-daily. The primary endpoint was the global assessment of satisfactory relief of IBS symptoms in ≥50% of weeks during intervention. IBS symptoms were also measured with the IBS severity scoring system; immune activity was measured by mucosal patch technology. A post hoc meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials of mesalazine in IBS was added. Results Of 181 included patients, 91 received mesalazine and 90 received placebo. The primary endpoint was met by 32 (36%) patients after mesalazine and 27 (30%) after placebo (p = 0.40). There were no differences in response rates related to IBS subtype or post-infection symptom onset. More reduction of abdominal bloating was noted in the mesalazine group (p = 0.02). The meta-analysis showed no effect of mesalazine on IBS symptoms. No mucosal patch technology measure could predict response to mesalazine, and found no differences in the effects of intervention on levels of immune markers. Conclusions Mesalazine is ineffective in reducing IBS symptoms. Rectal measures of immune activity by the mucosal patch technology cannot predict a higher chance of response to mesalazine.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleRandomised clinical trial and meta-analysis: mesalazine treatment in irritable bowel syndrome—effects on gastrointestinal symptoms and rectal biomarkers of immune activityen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/apt.17182
dc.identifier.cristin2064464
dc.source.journalAlimentary Pharmacology and Therapeuticsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber968-979en_US
dc.identifier.citationAlimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2022, 56 (6), 968-979.en_US
dc.source.volume56en_US
dc.source.issue6en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal