Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKoçyiğit, Duygu
dc.contributor.authorSarıgül, Nedim Umutay
dc.contributor.authorAltın, Timuçin
dc.contributor.authorÇay, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorNormand, Camilla Jacqueline Hansine
dc.contributor.authorLinde, Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorDickstein, Kenneth
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-09T13:46:55Z
dc.date.available2022-11-09T13:46:55Z
dc.date.created2022-06-10T19:43:42Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1016-5169
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3030977
dc.description.abstractObjective: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is the guideline-directed treatment option in selected heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction patients. Data regarding the contemporary clinical practice of cardiac resynchronization therapy in Turkey have been published recently. This sub-study aims to compare clinical and periprocedural characteristics between cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade and de novo implantations. Methods: Turkish arm of the Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey-II was conducted between October 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016, at 16 centers. All consecutive patients who underwent an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy system (n=60) or de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation (n=335) were eligible. Results: Distribution of age, gender, and heart failure etiology were similar in the 2 groups. Atrial fibrillation, valvular heart disease, and chronic kidney disease were more common in cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade patients. Narrow intrinsic QRS duration and left ventricular ejection fraction being 75% in both groups, and only beta-blockers were prescribed at rates of >90% in both groups. Conclusion: Cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrades are performed with high procedural success rates and without excess periprocedural complication risk. Feared complications of cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrades due to the pre-existing device should not delay the procedure if indicated.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Society of Cardiologyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleUpgrades from Previous Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Compared to De Novo Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Implantations: Results from CRT Survey-II in the Turkish Populationen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.5543/tkda.2022.21107
dc.identifier.cristin2030942
dc.source.journalTurk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivien_US
dc.source.pagenumber182-191en_US
dc.identifier.citationTurk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi. 2022, 50 (3), 182-191.en_US
dc.source.volume50en_US
dc.source.issue3en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal