Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDaltveit, Dagrun Slettebø
dc.contributor.authorKlungsøyr, Kari
dc.contributor.authorEngeland, Anders
dc.contributor.authorEkbom, Anders
dc.contributor.authorGissler, Mika
dc.contributor.authorGlimelius, Ingrid
dc.contributor.authorGrotmol, Tom
dc.contributor.authorMadanat-Harjuoja, Laura
dc.contributor.authorOrding, Anne Gulbech
dc.contributor.authorSørensen, Henrik Toft
dc.contributor.authorTroisi, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorBjørge, Tone
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-12T12:13:36Z
dc.date.available2022-12-12T12:13:36Z
dc.date.created2022-11-14T10:20:23Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0300-5771
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3037245
dc.description.abstractBackground Childhood cancer is more common among children with birth defects, suggesting a common aetiology. Whether this association differs by sex is unclear. Methods We performed a population-based nested case-control study using nationwide health registries in four Nordic countries. We included 21 898 cancer cases (0–19 years) and 218 980 matched population controls, born 1967–2014. Associations between childhood cancer and major birth defects were calculated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression models. Effect modification was evaluated using a counterfactual framework to estimate confidence intervals and P-values for the natural indirect effects. Results Birth defects were present for 5.1% (1117/21 898) of childhood cancer cases and 2.2% (4873/218 980) of controls; OR of cancer was higher for chromosomal (OR = 10, 95% CI = 8.6–12) than for non-chromosomal defects (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.8–2.1), strongest between genetic syndromes/microdeletion and renal tumours, Down syndrome and leukaemia, and nervous system defects and central nervous system tumours. The association between birth defects and cancer was stronger among females (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 2.6–3.1) than males (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.9–2.2, Pinteraction <0.001). Male sex was an independent risk factor for childhood cancer, but very little of the overall association between sex and childhood cancer was mediated through birth defects (4.8%, PNIE <0.001), although more at younger ages (10% below years and 28% below 1 year). Conclusions The birth defect–cancer associations were generally stronger among females than males. Birth defects did not act as a strong mediator for the modest differences in childhood cancer risk by sex, suggesting that other biological pathways are involved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSex differences in childhood cancer risk among children with major birth defects: a Nordic population-based nested case-control studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ije/dyac192
dc.identifier.cristin2073284
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Epidemiologyen_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 320360en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Epidemiology. 2022.en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal