Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGidske, Gro
dc.contributor.authorSandberg, Sverre
dc.contributor.authorFossum, Anne Lise
dc.contributor.authorBinder, Stein Bjarne
dc.contributor.authorLangsjøen, Eva Camilla
dc.contributor.authorSolsvik, Anne E.
dc.contributor.authorStavelin, Anne
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-29T09:02:43Z
dc.date.available2022-12-29T09:02:43Z
dc.date.created2022-05-23T10:29:07Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1434-6621
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3039684
dc.description.abstractObjectives Internal quality control (IQC) plays an important role in quality assurance in laboratory medicine. However, there is no universal consensus or guideline on when and how IQC should be analyzed on point-of-care testing (POCT) devices. The aim of this study was to develop a scoring system to determine how often IQC should be analyzed in primary healthcare on the various POCT devices. Methods Based on a systematic literature review and a thorough process involving the whole Noklus, a nationwide POC organization, a scoring system for when to analyze IQC was developed. Four factors were considered to significantly impact IQC frequency: The importance of the analyte in diagnosing and monitoring patients, type of POCT device, user-friendliness, and number of patient samples. For each POCT device, the first three factors were given a score, and the sum of the scores determined the general recommended IQC frequency. The number of patient samples determined whether and how to adjust these frequencies in each individual general practice. Results The scoring system was applied to 17 analytes and 134 different POCT devices (153 analyte-device combinations). Most of the devices analyzing high-risk analytes (71 out of 74) obtained daily or weekly IQC frequency. For example, all blood-cell counters and all glucose meters should undergo IQC daily and weekly, respectively. Conclusions This study presents a consensus-based scoring system for differentiated and device-specific recommendations for IQC frequency on POCT devices in primary healthcare. The scoring system can easily be adopted to other local environments and is easy to use.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDe Gruyteren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePoint-of-care testing in primary healthcare: a scoring system to determine the frequency of performing internal quality controlen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/cclm-2021-1258
dc.identifier.cristin2026410
dc.source.journalClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicineen_US
dc.source.pagenumber740-747en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2022, 60 (5), 740-747.en_US
dc.source.volume60en_US
dc.source.issue5en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal