Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKhatun, Fatema
dc.contributor.authorDistler, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorRahman, Monjur
dc.contributor.authorO’Donnell, Brian
dc.contributor.authorGachuhi, Noni
dc.contributor.authorAlwani, Manoj
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yang
dc.contributor.authorRahman, Anisur
dc.contributor.authorFrøen, Jahn Frederik Alexander Claude
dc.contributor.authorFriberg, Ingrid Kristina
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-29T09:55:54Z
dc.date.available2022-12-29T09:55:54Z
dc.date.created2022-05-28T15:20:43Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1654-9716
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3039698
dc.description.abstractBackground Unique identifiers are not universal in low- and middle-income countries. Biometric solutions have the potential to augment existing name-based searches used for identification in these settings. This paper describes a comparison of the searching accuracy of a palm-based biometric solution with a name-based database. Objective To compare the identification of individuals between a palm-based biometric solution to a name-based District Health Information Software 2 (DHIS2) Android application, in a low-resource setting. Methods The study was conducted in Chandpur district, Bangladesh. Trained data collectors enrolled 150 women of reproductive age into two android applications – i) a name-based DHIS2 application, and ii) a palm-based biometric solution – both run on tablets. One week after enrollment, a different research team member attempted to re-identify each enrolled woman using both systems. A single image or text-based name was used for searching at the time of re-identification. We interviewed data collectors at the end of the study. Results Significantly more women were successfully identified on the first attempt with a palm-based biometric application (84%) compared with the name-based DHIS2 application (61%). The proportion of identifications that required three or more attempts was similar between name-based (7%, CI 3.7–12.3) and palm-based biometric system (5%, CI: 1.9–9.4). However, the total number of attempts needed was significantly lower with the palm-based solution (mean 1.2 vs. 1.5, p < 0.001). In a group discussion, data collectors reported that the palm-based biometric identification system was both accurate and easy to use. Conclusion A palm-based biometric identification system on mobile devices was found to be an easy-to-use and accurate technology for the unique identification of individuals compared to an existing name-based application. Our findings imply that palm-based biometrics on mobile devices may be the next step in establishing unique identifiers in remote and rural settings where they are currently absent.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleComparison of a palm-based biometric solution with a name-based identification system in rural Bangladeshen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber2045769en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/16549716.2022.2045769
dc.identifier.cristin2027885
dc.source.journalGlobal health actionen_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 223269en_US
dc.identifier.citationGlobal health action. 2022, 15, 2045769.en_US
dc.source.volume15en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal