Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKhatun, Fatema
dc.contributor.authorDistler, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorRahman, Monjur
dc.contributor.authorO’Donnell, Brian
dc.contributor.authorGachuhi, Noni
dc.contributor.authorAlwani, Manoj
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yang
dc.contributor.authorRahman, Anisur
dc.contributor.authorFrøen, Jahn Frederik Alexander Claude
dc.contributor.authorFriberg, Ingrid Kristina
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-29T09:55:54Z
dc.date.available2022-12-29T09:55:54Z
dc.date.created2022-05-28T15:20:43Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1654-9716
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3039698
dc.description.abstractBackground Unique identifiers are not universal in low- and middle-income countries. Biometric solutions have the potential to augment existing name-based searches used for identification in these settings. This paper describes a comparison of the searching accuracy of a palm-based biometric solution with a name-based database. Objective To compare the identification of individuals between a palm-based biometric solution to a name-based District Health Information Software 2 (DHIS2) Android application, in a low-resource setting. Methods The study was conducted in Chandpur district, Bangladesh. Trained data collectors enrolled 150 women of reproductive age into two android applications – i) a name-based DHIS2 application, and ii) a palm-based biometric solution – both run on tablets. One week after enrollment, a different research team member attempted to re-identify each enrolled woman using both systems. A single image or text-based name was used for searching at the time of re-identification. We interviewed data collectors at the end of the study. Results Significantly more women were successfully identified on the first attempt with a palm-based biometric application (84%) compared with the name-based DHIS2 application (61%). The proportion of identifications that required three or more attempts was similar between name-based (7%, CI 3.7–12.3) and palm-based biometric system (5%, CI: 1.9–9.4). However, the total number of attempts needed was significantly lower with the palm-based solution (mean 1.2 vs. 1.5, p < 0.001). In a group discussion, data collectors reported that the palm-based biometric identification system was both accurate and easy to use. Conclusion A palm-based biometric identification system on mobile devices was found to be an easy-to-use and accurate technology for the unique identification of individuals compared to an existing name-based application. Our findings imply that palm-based biometrics on mobile devices may be the next step in establishing unique identifiers in remote and rural settings where they are currently absent.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleComparison of a palm-based biometric solution with a name-based identification system in rural Bangladeshen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber2045769en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/16549716.2022.2045769
dc.identifier.cristin2027885
dc.source.journalGlobal health actionen_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 223269en_US
dc.identifier.citationGlobal health action. 2022, 15, 2045769.en_US
dc.source.volume15en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal