Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTiulpin, Aleksei
dc.contributor.authorSaarakkala, Simo
dc.contributor.authorMathiessen, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorHammer, Hilde Berner
dc.contributor.authorFurnes, Ove Nord
dc.contributor.authorNordsletten, Lars
dc.contributor.authorEnglund, Martin
dc.contributor.authorMagnusson, Karin
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-30T13:03:46Z
dc.date.available2023-01-30T13:03:46Z
dc.date.created2022-12-20T12:22:59Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2665-9131
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3047135
dc.description.abstractObjective To investigate the value of ultrasonographic data in predicting total knee replacement (TKR). Design Data from the Musculoskeletal Pain in Ullensaker study (MUST) was linked to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register to form a 5–7 year prospective cohort study of 630 persons (69% women, mean (SD) age 64 (8.7) years). We examined the predictive power of ultrasound (US) features, i.e. osteophytes, meniscal extrusion, synovitis in the suprapatellar recess, femoral cartilage thickness, and quality for future knee osteoarthritis (OA) surgery. We investigated 4 main settings for multivariate predictive modeling: 1) clinical predictors (age, sex, body mass index, knee injury, familial OA and workload), 2) radiographic data (assessed by the Kellgren Lawrence grade, KL) with clinical predictors, 3) US features and clinical predictors. Finally, we also considered an ensemble of models 2) and 3) and used it as our fifth model. All models were compared using the Average Precision (AP) and the Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) metrics. Results Clinical predictors yielded AP of 0.11 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05–0.23) and AUC of 0.69 (0.58–0.79). Clinical predictors with KL grade yielded AP of 0.20 (0.12–0.33) and AUC of 0.81 (0.67–0.90). The clinical variables with ultrasound yielded AP of 0.17 (0.08–0.30) and AUC of 0.79 (0.69–0.86). Conclusion Ultrasonographic examination of the knee may provide added value to basic clinical and demographic descriptors when predicting TKR. While it does not achieve the same predictive performance as radiography, it can provide additional value to the radiographic examination.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePredicting total knee arthroplasty from ultrasonography using machine learningen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber100319en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ocarto.2022.100319
dc.identifier.cristin2095656
dc.source.journalOsteoarthritis and Cartilage Openen_US
dc.identifier.citationOsteoarthritis and Cartilage Open. 2022, 4 (4), 100319.en_US
dc.source.volume4en_US
dc.source.issue4en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal