Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorElgesem, Dag
dc.contributor.authorBrüggemann, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-29T11:14:57Z
dc.date.available2023-03-29T11:14:57Z
dc.date.created2022-09-02T09:18:54Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0267-3231
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3060878
dc.description.abstractTo what extent was Greta Thunberg a ‘polarizing figure’ on Facebook, in the period when she received the most extensive media attention? The paper analyses seven months of discussion concerning Thunberg and her message of intergenerational climate justice, using all relevant posts on public Facebook pages in Germany, Sweden, and the UK. We find that there are many similarities in the attitudes expressed and topics discussed on Facebook in the three countries; however, there are also some striking differences in the levels of polarisation. This comparative study provides evidence that the level of polarisation around these topics on Facebook is very low in Sweden and the UK, but high in Germany. In Germany, a group of political actors stand out as particularly polarising, and, in contrast to the other two countries, the topic of intergeneration justice, the core of Thunberg’s message, is almost absent from the German Facebook discourse. The study shows that Thunberg was not in general a polarising figure in the three European countries and that neither the affordances offered by the platform nor features of her person, message, or activism explain the observed polarisation around Thunberg on Facebook.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSageen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePolarisation or just differences in opinion: How and why Facebook users disagree about Greta Thunbergen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/02673231221116179
dc.identifier.cristin2048152
dc.source.journalEuropean Journal of Communicationen_US
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Communication. 2022.en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal