Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorYendell, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorHerbert, David Eric John
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-31T11:29:11Z
dc.date.available2023-03-31T11:29:11Z
dc.date.created2022-12-13T11:21:32Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3061436
dc.description.abstractWhile some research addresses the relationship between religiosity and political attitudes, little is known about the relationship between religion, conspiracy beliefs, and political culture. Using the concept of authoritarianism, we hypothesise that a conspiracy mentality is likely to be associated with ethnocentric and anti‐democratic attitudes, just as some types of religion—e.g., religious fundamentalism—have a close affinity to authoritarian attitudes. Using data from an online UK survey (N = 1093; quota sample, representative of education, gender, age, and region), we enquire to what extent belief in conspiracy theories is associated with xenophobic, racist, and anti‐democratic attitudes, which aspects of religiosity in combination with other factors play a role in conspiracy beliefs, and which communicative and interpretative practices are associated with belief in conspiracy ideologies. Our analysis reveals that both belief in classical conspiracy theories and belief in Covid‐19 conspiracy theories are significantly related to anti‐Muslim sentiments, anti‐Black racism, and right‐wing extremism. Moreover, a regression analysis shows that an initially discovered relationship between the strength of religiosity and conspiracy mentality disappears once religious fundamentalism is included in the model. The effect of religious fundamentalism is moderated by narcissism and the style of social media use—namely, trusting posts made by one’s friends more than the opinions of experts.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCogitatioen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleReligion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UKen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 the authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.17645/pag.v10i4.5904
dc.identifier.cristin2092456
dc.source.journalPolitics and Governanceen_US
dc.source.pagenumber229-242en_US
dc.identifier.citationPolitics and Governance. 2022, 10 (4), 229-242.en_US
dc.source.volume10en_US
dc.source.issue4en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal