Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRosendahl-Riise, Hanne
dc.contributor.authorAksnes, Siri Yde
dc.contributor.authorSabir, Zoya
dc.contributor.authorUlleberg, Ellen Kathrine
dc.contributor.authorMyklebust-Hansen, Thea
dc.contributor.authorAakre, Inger
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-08T12:42:36Z
dc.date.available2023-12-08T12:42:36Z
dc.date.created2023-10-10T12:42:58Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2048-6790
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3106633
dc.description.abstractMild-to-moderate iodine deficiency remains a problem worldwide, including in Norway. Of particular, concern is fertile, pregnant and lactating women. The Norwegian Dairy Council developed a digital iodine-specific dietary screener (I-screener) for the assessment of iodine intake levels but has yet to be validated. The aim was thus to investigate the relative validity of the I-screener by comparing estimates of iodine intake from the I-screener against a single 24-hour recall (24HR) and urinary iodine concentration (UIC) in fertile women. Healthy females were recruited in Bergen in August–December 2021. Six spot-urine samples from six consecutive days were collected into a pooled sample to assess UIC. Each participant completed a single administration of the I-screener and the 24HR. The estimated daily iodine intake from the I-screener was compared with the estimations from the 24HR and UIC. Seventy-two women aged 19–39 completed the study. The median UIC was 76 μg/l. Compared with the 24HR, the I-screener placed 83 % of the participants in the same/adjacent tertial, with a slight agreement between the methods (Cohen's kappa = 0⋅187). The present study shows an acceptable correlation between the I-screener and the 24HR (r = 0⋅318), but not between the I-screener and UIC (r = 0⋅122). Despite its varying iodine estimate abilities, the I-screener may be used as an initial screening tool to rank fertile women on an individual level into deficient inadequate, and sufficient iodine intake. However, due to the relatively high risk of misclassification, further assessment of iodine status should follow.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleComparison of a digital iodine-specific dietary screener with 24-hour recall and urinary iodine concentrationen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumbere90en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/jns.2023.74
dc.identifier.cristin2183321
dc.source.journalJournal of Nutritional Science (JNS)en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Nutritional Science (JNS). 2023, 12, e90.en_US
dc.source.volume12en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal