Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBärebring, Linnea
dc.contributor.authorLamberg-Allardt, Christel
dc.contributor.authorThorisdottir, Birna
dc.contributor.authorRamel, Alfons
dc.contributor.authorSöderlund, Fredrik
dc.contributor.authorArnesen, Erik Kristoffer
dc.contributor.authorNwaru, Bright I.
dc.contributor.authorDierkes, Jutta
dc.contributor.authorÅkesson, Agneta
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-12T12:26:02Z
dc.date.available2024-02-12T12:26:02Z
dc.date.created2023-09-05T10:23:19Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn1654-6628
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3116988
dc.description.abstractObjective: To systematically review the evidence for whether habitual or different levels of experimental intake of vitamin B12 from diet and supplements is sufficient to ensure adequate B12 status in groups most susceptible to vitamin B12 deficiency. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus up to 21 May 2021, for intervention studies, prospective cohort studies and case-control studies assessing B12 intake from diet and/or supplements in relation to B12 status (s/p-B12, holotranscobalamin, methylmalonic acid, homocysteine or breastmilk B12). Cross-sectional studies were eligible for studies conducted during pregnancy and lactation. Included populations were children (0–18 years), young adults (18–35 years), pregnant or lactating women, older adults (≥65 years) and vegans or vegetarians. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted by two assessors independently. The evidence was synthesized qualitatively and classified according to the World Cancer Research Fund. Results: The searches yielded 4855 articles of which 89 were assessed in full text and 18 included. Three studies were conducted during pregnancy and three during lactation or infancy – all observational. Eight studies were conducted among older adults; most were interventions among B12-deficient participants. Four studies were eligible for vegetarian and vegans, all interventions. The strength of evidence that habitual B12 intake or an intake in line with the current Nordic recommended intake (RI) is sufficient to ensure adequate status was considered Limited – no conclusion for all included populations. Conclusion: Evidence is insufficient to assess if or which level of B12 intake is sufficient to maintain adequate status for all included populations. Population-based cohort studies and low-to-moderate dose interventions that address this question are highly warranted.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSwedish Nutrition Foundationen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleIntake of vitamin B12 in relation to vitamin B12 status in groups susceptible to deficiency: a systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber8626en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.29219/fnr.v67.8626
dc.identifier.cristin2172398
dc.source.journalFood & Nutrition Research (FNR)en_US
dc.identifier.citationFood & Nutrition Research (FNR). 2023, 67, 8626 .en_US
dc.source.volume67en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal