Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPolok, Kamil
dc.contributor.authorFronczek, Jakub
dc.contributor.authorPutowski, Zbigniew
dc.contributor.authorCzok, Marcelina
dc.contributor.authorGuidet, Bertrand
dc.contributor.authorJung, Christian
dc.contributor.authorde Lange, Dylan
dc.contributor.authorLeaver, Susannah
dc.contributor.authorMoreno, Rui
dc.contributor.authorFlaatten, Hans Kristian
dc.contributor.authorSzczeklik, Wojciech
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-13T12:16:27Z
dc.date.available2024-02-13T12:16:27Z
dc.date.created2023-11-09T12:29:50Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2110-5820
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3117276
dc.description.abstractBackground Little is known about the performance of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in older critically ill adults. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of physiological disturbances in the six organ systems included in the SOFA score. Methods We analysed previously collected data from a prospective cohort study conducted between 2018 and 2019 in 22 countries. Consecutive patients ≥ 80 years old acutely admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) were eligible for inclusion. Patients were followed up for 30 days after admission to the ICU. We used logistic regression to study the association between increasing severity of organ dysfunction and mortality. Results The median SOFA score among 3882 analysed patients was equal to 6 (IQR: 4–9). Mortality was equal to 26.1% (95% CI 24.7–27.5%) in the ICU and 38.7% (95% CI 37.1–40.2%) at day 30. Organ failure defined as a SOFA score ≥ 3 was associated with variable adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for ICU mortality dependant on the organ system affected: respiratory, 1.53 (95% CI 1.29–1.81); cardiovascular 1.69 (95% CI 1.43–2.01); hepatic, 1.74 (95% CI 0.97–3.15); renal, 1.87 (95% CI 1.48–2.35); central nervous system, 2.79 (95% CI 2.34–3.33); coagulation, 2.72 (95% CI 1.66–4.48). Modelling consecutive levels of organ dysfunction resulted in aORs equal to 0.57 (95% CI 0.33–1.00) when patients scored 2 points in the cardiovascular system and 1.01 (0.79–1.30) when the cardiovascular SOFA equalled 3. Conclusions Different components of the SOFA score have different prognostic implications for older critically ill adults. The cardiovascular component of the SOFA score requires revision.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleValidity of the total SOFA score in patients ≥ 80 years old acutely admitted to intensive care units: a post-hoc analysis of the VIP2 prospective, international cohort studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber98en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13613-023-01191-0
dc.identifier.cristin2194518
dc.source.journalAnnals of Intensive Careen_US
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Intensive Care. 2023, 13 (1), 98.en_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal