dc.contributor.author | Öst, Lars Gøran | |
dc.contributor.author | Enebrink, Pia | |
dc.contributor.author | Finnes, Anna | |
dc.contributor.author | Ghaderi, Ata | |
dc.contributor.author | Havnen, Audun | |
dc.contributor.author | Kvale, Gerd | |
dc.contributor.author | Salomonsson, Sigrid | |
dc.contributor.author | Wergeland, Gro Janne Henningsen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-11T10:00:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-11T10:00:41Z | |
dc.date.created | 2023-04-17T14:51:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0165-0327 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3121752 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background
Different cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) have strong research support for treatment of adult depressive disorders (DD). Given the scarcity of knowledge about the performance of CBT in routine clinical care, a systematic review and meta-analysis of CBT for adults with DD treated in this context was conducted.
Methods
Published studies until the end of September 2022, were systematically searched in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase OVID, and PsycINFO. The effectiveness of CBT, methodological quality, and moderators of treatment outcome were examined, and benchmarked by meta-analytically comparing with efficacy studies for DD.
Results
Twenty-eight studies, comprising 3734 participants, were included. Large within-group effect sizes (ES) were obtained for DD-severity at post-treatment, and follow-up, on average 8 months post-treatment. Benchmarking analysis showed that effectiveness studies had very similar ESs as efficacy studies at post-treatment (1.51 vs. 1.71) and follow-up (1.71 vs. 1.85). Remission rates were also very similar; effectiveness studies 44 % and 46 %, efficacy studies 45 % and 46 %, at post-treatment and follow-up, respectively.
Limitations
Only studies published in English-language peer-reviewed journals were included and the use of pre-post ES in the meta-analyses could contribute to biased outcomes.
Conclusions
CBT for DD is an effective treatment when delivered in routine clinical care and the outcomes of effectiveness studies for DD are comparable to the effects obtained in efficacy studies. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | Cognitive behavior therapy for adult depressive disorders in routine clinical care: A systematic review and meta-analysis | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.version | acceptedVersion | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2023 Elsevier | en_US |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | postprint | |
cristin.fulltext | postprint | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jad.2023.03.002 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 2141344 | |
dc.source.journal | Journal of Affective Disorders | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 322-333 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Affective Disorders. 2023, 331, 322-333. | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 331 | en_US |