Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorVindfeld, Søren
dc.contributor.authorLindanger, Line
dc.contributor.authorInderhaug, Eivind
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-14T14:08:50Z
dc.date.available2024-05-14T14:08:50Z
dc.date.created2023-11-28T07:57:23Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2635-0254
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3130409
dc.description.abstractBackground: Tunnel widening, slightly malplaced former tunnels or bone loss due to hardware removal might prevent a 1-stage anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision procedure due to tunnel convergence or challenging graft fixation. A range of graft sources and bone grafting techniques are described—all with their strengths and limitations. Common autograft techniques come with substantial donor site morbidity that might hinder postoperative rehabilitation. Indications: Graft tunnel issues might prompt the need for structural grafts and a 2-stage ACL revision approach. The use of the current dowel allograft technique gives a flexible approach where 1 or several cylindrical grafts can be placed in prepared sockets for reliable bony ingrowth. Technique Description: Using femoral head allografts and cannulated coring reamers, multiple bone dowels (up to 6) can give a flexible and adaptable bone grafting situation. The intra-articular tunnels are dilated, and dowels are produced to allow a press-fit fixation that facilitates good bone healing. Removal of sclerotic bone and microfracture is key to allow optimal bone-to-bone healing. Use of cannulas inserted through the arthroscopic portals and tamps plug advancement will give a reliable graft deployment without dowel breakage. Results: The current authors have used this uniform technique for 119 patients since 2014. All cases displayed good bony healing at 5 months after surgery on computed tomography and radiographs, and 115 out of 119 went on to have a stage 2 revision ACL surgery at 6 months spacing from the bone grafting. The most common reason for not going through the second-stage revision was improvement of symptoms due to graft removal and bone grafting during the first surgery. Discussion/Conclusion: The current allograft dowel bone grafting allows for a flexible bone grafting in cases where a 1-step ACL revision procedure is not feasible. Reliable bony ingrowth is seen in the current cohort allowing the final step of ACL revision at 6 months spacing from bone grafting.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSAGEen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAllogenous Bone Grafting Technique for Staged Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgeryen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 the authorsen_US
dc.source.articlenumber26350254231200038en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/26350254231200038
dc.identifier.cristin2203378
dc.source.journalVideo Journal of Sports Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citationVideo Journal of Sports Medicine. 2023, 3 (5), 26350254231200038.en_US
dc.source.volume3en_US
dc.source.issue5en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal