Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBartels, Stefanen_US
dc.contributor.authorGjertsen, Jan-Eriken_US
dc.contributor.authorFrihagen, Frede Jonen_US
dc.contributor.authorRogmark, Ceciliaen_US
dc.contributor.authorUtvåg, Stein-Eriken_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-26T12:49:54Z
dc.date.available2018-03-26T12:49:54Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.PublishedBartels S, Gjertsen JE, Frihagen FJ, Rogmark C, Utvåg SE. High failure rate after internal fixation and beneficial outcome after arthroplasty in treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients between 55 and 70 years. An observational study of 2,713 patients reported to the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register. Acta Orthopaedica. 2017;89:53-58eng
dc.identifier.issn1745-3674
dc.identifier.issn1745-3682
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/17556
dc.description.abstractBackground and purpose — The treatment of patients between 55 and 70 years with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fracture remains controversial. We compared internal fixation (IF), bipolar hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in terms of mortality, reoperations and patient-reported outcome by using data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register. Patients and methods — We included 2,713 patients treated between 2005 and 2012. 1,111 patients were treated with IF, 1,030 with HA and 572 patients with THA. Major reoperations (defined as re-osteosynthesis, secondary arthroplasty, exchange, or removal of prosthesis components and Girdlestone procedure), patient-reported outcome measures (satisfaction, pain, and health-related quality of life (EQ5D) after 4 and 12 months), 1-year mortality, and change in treatment methods over the study period were investigated. Results — Major reoperations occurred in 27% after IF, 3.8% after HA and 2.8% after THA. 549 patients (20% of total study population) answered both questionnaires. Compared with IF, patients treated with THA were more satisfied after 4 and 12 months, reported less pain after 4 months and 12 months, had a higher EQ5D-index score after 4 months and 12 months, and EQ-VAS score after 4 months. Compared with IF, patients treated with HA were more satisfied and reported less pain after 4 months. EQ5D-index and EQ-VAS were similar. Patients treated with HA had higher 1-year mortality and had more comorbidities than both the THA and IF group. All these differences were statistically and clinically significant. Interpretation — This study showed high reoperation rate after IF and better patient-reported outcome after both THA and HA with medium follow-up. Patients selected for HA represented a frailer group than patients treated with THA or IF.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherTaylor & Franciseng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BY-NCeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/eng
dc.titleHigh failure rate after internal fixation and beneficial outcome after arthroplasty in treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients between 55 and 70 years. An observational study of 2,713 patients reported to the Norwegian Hip Fracture Registeren_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2018-01-12T11:35:08Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2017 The Author(s)
dc.subject.hrcsMuskulatur og skjelett: Kirurgi
dc.subject.hrcsMusculoskeletal : Surgery
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1376514
dc.identifier.cristin1501173
dc.source.journalActa Orthopaedica


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY-NC
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY-NC