dc.contributor.author | Gilbert, Graham Lewis | |
dc.contributor.author | Christiansen, Hanne H | |
dc.contributor.author | Neumann, Ulrich | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-18T09:31:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-04-18T09:31:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1956/17626 | |
dc.description.abstract | This technical note presents three scales of drilling infrastructure for comparison. These three methods include: (1) a small hand-drill designed for retrieving cores down to ca. 5 m depth, (2) the medium-scale UNIS Permafrost Drill Rig (down to ca. 50 m depth), and (3) an industrial drill rig designed for coring to depths of greater than 1 km. All methods vary with respect to maximum drill depth, operational cost, and ease of transport throughout the landscape. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
dc.publisher | GEOQuébec2015 | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Proceedings GeoQuébec 2015 – 68th Canadian Geotechnical Conference and 7th Canadian Permafrost Conference | |
dc.title | Coring of unconsolidated permafrost deposits: methodological successes and challenges | en_US |
dc.type | Chapter | |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | In: Proceedings GeoQuébec 2015 – 68th Canadian Geotechnical Conference and 7th Canadian Permafrost Conference, 20–23 September 2015, Québec, Canada. Paper 6 pp. | |