| dc.contributor.author | Øgaard, Tore Fjetland | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-11T13:23:45Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-12-11T13:23:45Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.Published | Øgaard T.F. Substitution in Relevant Logics. The Review of Symbolic Logic. 2019 | eng |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1755-0211 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1755-0203 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1956/21091 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This essay discusses rules and semantic clauses relating to Substitution—Leibniz’s law in the conjunctive-implicational form s = t ^ A(s) -> A(t)—as these are put forward in Priest’s books "In Contradiction" and "An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is." The stated rules and clauses are shown to be too weak in some cases and too strong in others. New ones are presented and shown to be correct. Justification for the various rules are probed and it is argued that Substitution ought to fail. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
| dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | eng |
| dc.subject | Ikke-klassisk logikk / Non-classical logic | eng |
| dc.title | Substitution in Relevant Logics | eng |
| dc.type | Peer reviewed | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| dc.date.updated | 2019-10-06T20:43:03Z | |
| dc.description.version | publishedVersion | |
| dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2019 Association for Symbolic Logic | eng |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755020319000467 | |
| dc.identifier.cristin | 1726606 | |
| dc.source.journal | The Review of Symbolic Logic | |
| dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Humaniora: 000::Filosofiske fag: 160::Logikk: 163 | |
| dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Humanities: 000::Philosophy: 160::Logic: 163 | |
