Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGranslo, Jens Toreen_US
dc.contributor.authorBråtveit, Magneen_US
dc.contributor.authorHollund, Bjørg Elien_US
dc.contributor.authorIrgens, Ågoten_US
dc.contributor.authorSvanes, Cecilieen_US
dc.contributor.authorMagerøy, Nilsen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoen, Bente E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-22T10:05:07Z
dc.date.available2013-05-22T10:05:07Z
dc.date.issued2012-12-12eng
dc.PublishedBMC Pulmonary Medicine 2012, 12:76eng
dc.identifier.issn1471-2466
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/6643
dc.description.abstractBackground: Oil tanks containing a mixture of hydrocarbons, including sulphuric compounds, exploded and caught fire in an industrial harbour. This study assesses airway symptoms and lung function in the nearby population 1½ years after the explosion. Methods: A cross-sectional study included individuals ≥18 years old. Individuals living <6 km (sub-groups <3km and 3–6 km) from the accident site formed the exposed group, individuals living >20 km away formed a control group. A questionnaire and spirometry tests were completed by 223 exposed individuals (response rate men 70%, women 75%) and 179 control individuals (response rate men 51%, women 65%). Regression analyses included adjustment for smoking, occupational exposure, atopy, infection in the preceding month and age. Analyses of symptoms were also adjusted for stress reactions related to the accident. Results: Exposed individuals experienced significantly more blocked nose (odds ratio 1.7 [95% confidence interval 1.0, 2.8]), rhinorrhoea (1.6 [1.1, 3.3]), nose irritation (3.4 [2.0, 5.9]), sore throat (3.1 [1.8, 5.5]), morning cough (3.5 [2.0, 5.5]), daily cough (2.2 [1.4, 3.7]), cough >3 months a year (2.9 [1.5, 5.3]) and cough with phlegm (1.9 [1.2, 3.1]) than control individuals. A significantly increasing trend was found for nose symptoms and cough, depending on the proximity of home address to explosion site (daily cough, 3-6km 1.8 [1.0, 3.1], <3km 3.0 [1.7, 6.4]). Lung function measurements were significantly lower in the exposed group than in the control group, FEV1 adjusted mean difference −123 mL [95% confidence interval −232, -14]), FEV1% predicted −2.5 [−5.5, 0.5], FVC −173 mL [− 297, -50], FVC% predicted −3.1 [− 5.9, -0.4], and airway obstruction (GOLD II/III). Conclusions: Based on cross sectional analyses, individuals living in an area with air pollution from an oil tank explosion had more airway symptoms and lower lung function than a control group 1½ years after the incident.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/eng
dc.subjectAirway symptomseng
dc.subjectEnvironmental pollutantseng
dc.subjectLung functioneng
dc.titleAirway symptoms and lung function in the local population after the oil tank explosion in Gulen, Norwayen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2012 Granslo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-12-76
dc.identifier.cristin985498
dc.source.journalBMC Pulmonary Medicine
dc.source.4012


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY